Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: C:\Users\Francisco\Desktop\Transfer\web\hir\index_01.gif

Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: C:\Users\Francisco\Desktop\Transfer\web\hir\index_02.gif

Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: C:\Users\Francisco\Desktop\Transfer\web\hir\index_03.gif

 Francisco Gil-White, Editor

Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: C:\Users\Francisco\Desktop\Transfer\web\hir\index_04.gif

Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: C:\Users\Francisco\Desktop\Transfer\web\hir\index_05.gif

 

 

 

NEW BOOK / NUEVO LIBRO

 

 

 


EL COLAPSO DE
OCCIDENTE
el siguiente Holocausto y sus consecuencias

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ANTISEMITISM
& THE
 ARAB-ISRAELI
CONFLICT

Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: GO TO ARTICLES

Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: C:\Users\Francisco\Desktop\Transfer\web\hir\israel\attack.jpg

 

 

 

 

CIVIL WARS IN
YUGOSLAVIA

 

Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: GO TO ARTICLES

 

Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: C:\Users\Francisco\Desktop\Transfer\web\hir\yugo\time.jpg

 
IRAN & IRAK

Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: GO TO ARTICLES



 

 


 The modern attack
on Blacks

There is a well-funded attack against people of color, billing itself as supposedly mainstream science.

 

 

This is a continuation of the same eugenics movement that spawned German Nazism, and which never disappeared.

 

Prof. Francisco Gil-White, an expert on 'race' and ethnicity, documents and refutes this attack in Resurrecting Racism.
more»»

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

GLOBAL WARMING

 

—an hir series—

1

A brief guide to the series 9 June 2014

A brief introduction plus table of contents for this HIR series, which discusses why the Antarctic ice-core evidence is so important to a proper evaluation of the anthropogenic global warming (AGW) hypothesis, which holds that human production of CO2 is responsible for current global warming.

 

 

2

How do Al Gore and IPCC scientists reply to the ice core evidence? 9 June 2014

Science thrives on debate, so a good way to gauge the strength of the anthropogenic global warming (AGW) hypothesis is to examine how its proponents reply to the challenge posed by the Antarctic ice-core evidence. This is what we do here.

 

3

Nature (magazine), Antarctic ice cores, and the CO2 lag 9 June 2014

If climate science exhibits system-wide pathologies when the topic is global warming, there is no better place to look for them than the world’s most prestigious science journal: Nature. We will show here that something has gone terribly wrong with the peer review process at Nature.

 

4

The Antarctic ice cores, CO2, global warming and the media 30 June 2014

We document that the Western mass media appears to have zero independence from the IPCC, for it repeats whatever it reads in RealClimate, a blog set up by IPCC scientists.

 

5

Climategate: Are IPCC scientists guilty of willful deceit? 17 July 2014


The Climategate scandal erupted when thousands of emails of important IPCC scientists were hacked from the Climate Research Unit (CRU) at East Anglia University. These email exchanges are troubling, for they appear to confirm what many skeptics had charged: that IPCC scientists are playing a political game, rather than doing science.

 

 

ABOUT US

 

Notify me of new HIR pieces!

 

Contact us

 

Is this ‘conspiracy theory’?

 

About the HIR method

 

Does the West have a free press?

 

IS THE US AN ALLY OF ISRAEL?

 

What is a genocide?

 

 

Interview with EL ALEPH, Radio Red, Mexico City



HIR's FIRST PRINCIPLES

ARGUMENT A.

Premise 1. The way to do better geopolitics is to have a more accurate representation of the intentions and capabilities of other players in the international system.

Premise 2. The Government of the United States, the most important geopolitical player, has the strongest motivation to do better geopolitics.

Therefore: The Government of the United States works very hard to obtain a better understanding of the intentions and capabilities of other players in the international system.

Fact: CIA director George Tenet said in the year 1998 that the budget on that year had been a little under 27 billion. Recently, a US Intelligence official said in a press conference that the yearly budget was now 44 billion. But the truth is that nobody knows for sure, because the budget for US Intelligence is a state secret.

Hypothesis: The Government of the United States has very good information—definitely better than my own—on which to base its geopolitical decisions.

ARGUMENT B.

Premise 1. The Government of the United States, for many years running, has been the most powerful in the world.

Premise 2. Idiots don’t become the most powerful people in the world.

Therefore: The Government of the United States is not run by idiots.

Hypothesis: If the Government of the United States behaves in ways that seem idiotic to me, then a) there is something I don’t yet understand; or b) the people running this government has different values than my own. Or both. (And I have yet to accept this, which is why I think the behavior is idiotic.)

ARGUMENT C.

Premise 1. The true preferences of someone are revealed in his/her expensive behaviors.

Premise 2. Saying “My intentions are X” is not expensive but cheap.

Therefore: Speech acts (e.g. public and official declarations) don’t necessarily convey information about the true intentions of those running a government.

Hypothesis: If the government of the United States consistently, year after year, spends billions of dollars and achieves always similar results, and if these results contradict the publicly declared intentions of government officials, the publicly declared intentions must be deliberate deceptions.

These three arguments are the motivation for most of the research you will find in this website.


A F.A.C.E.S. project ( Foundation for the Analysis of Conflict, Ethnic and Social )
 

Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: http://www.hirhome.com/faces8.jpg