|Notify me of new HIR pieces!|
Murder at the Hague?
An investigation into the alleged suicide of
Historical and Investigative Research -
14 March 2006
First published in Emperor's Clothes (4 Nov 2002)
Slavko Dokmanovic, an ethnic Serb, and the mayor of a small town in what is now Croatia, was accused of war crimes, illegally abducted, and sent to the ICTY (International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia), at The Hague, Netherlands.
On June 29th, 1998, it was announced that Slavko Dokmanovic had committed suicide in his cell at the Scheveningen prison, where those being tried by the ICTY or 'Hague Tribunal' are kept. This was just one week before the Tribunal was to pass a verdict on the charges against Dokmanovic. According to the BBC, the Yugoslav government reacted to Dokmanovic’s death as follows:
As this analysis will show, the Yugoslav government could, and should have, leveled charges more serious than these.
Consider first that, on the day that Dokmanovic’s death was announced, the Associated Press wrote the following:
A man accused of war crimes (especially if he is innocent!) may naturally feel distraught and require psychiatric help. Feelings of apprehension may rise immediately prior to the verdict. But would a man expecting an acquittal commit suicide? Why not wait until the verdict?
Every alleged suicide is a possible murder, so if a man with good reason to live appears to have killed himself, the responsible authorities are supposed to investigate with zeal -- especially if there are suspicious circumstances, as was the case for Dokmanovic. About those circumstances, the same Associated Press wire wrote:
It is difficult to find anything here that makes sense.
First, if the guards last saw him alive at 11:30pm, and didn’t check on him again until midnight, when the body was supposedly found, then how can Chartier know that Dokmanovic shorted the light in his cell shortly after 11:30?
Is he psychic?
Second, if Dokmanovic never even hinted at having suicidal thoughts, why place him on suicide watch when he merely complains about not “feeling well”? But if he was placed on suicide watch, how could he hang himself without anyone noticing and stopping him?
A later wire, from Inter-Press Service, would have us believe that this was in fact relatively easy because Dokmanovic’s keepers obliged his supposedly suicidal intentions by leaving him his tie!
Notice that this is in direct contradiction to what we saw earlier: a man first described as never even hinting that he was suicidal is now alleged to have tried to kill himself twice before! Shall we pick our favorite version? And if Dokmanovic was placed on suicide watch, then it is not merely strange but downright incomprehensible that they should have left him his tie or razor.
I contacted the 18th District Philadelphia Police Department to obtain details about their policies in a suicide watch, and I learned the following:
My informant, one Sergeant Walsh, was not sure why the regulation time between checks is exactly 15 minutes, but he agreed with me that this is probably so that especially crafty prisoners will not find time enough to suffocate. Asked how he felt about a 30 minute interval, he reacted with surprise -- no, that was much too long. We’ve been told, however, that Slavko Dokmanovic was checked only every 30 minutes.
Sergeant Walsh also impressed upon me that suicide-watch regulations are not flexible in the least, as failure to follow them to the letter will result in suspension without pay. And when asked what the procedure would be in case a prisoner died while on suicide watch, he said: “To give you an idea of how serious this would be, any time there is a cell block incident it is investigated by a homicide unit.”
Now compare this to what the tribunal spokesman, Christian Chartier, said to the press and see if you can find anything that looks plausible. One version has Slavko Dokmanovic on suicide watch even though he never hinted he was suicidal and merely complained of not feeling well. The other version has him trying to commit suicide twice before, but he is nevertheless given long, 30-minute intervals between checks, his clothes are not removed, and -- most scandalously -- his tie and electric razor are left in his cell! Why? To give him a better chance on his third try?
We have nothing but suspicious stories here, and all the worse for not being mutually consistent. But, troubling as these questions may seem, they pale compared to those raised by glaring inconsistencies in other reports of the discovery of Dokmanovic’s body.
This, for example, is from Deutsche Presse-Agentur:
Notice what a different picture we get here. So casual. The guard opened the door because...he could not see in! There was no particular alarm about the light being out.
That is consistent with Dokmanovic complaining about not feeling well and getting checked by “a doctor,” not by a psychiatrist. Very casual. Health problems: routine.
But this contradicts the Associated Press wire cited earlier, which said that Dokmanovic was seen by a psychiatrist and placed on suicide watch. And yet, both reports are from the same day, and both cite the same Christian Chartier as their source.
The report below, which appeared the next day in The Scotsman, is also inconsistent:
This account has Dokmanovic’s lawyer (Toma Fila, not as written above) worrying about the supposedly suicidal Dokmanovic, and requesting medication and checks every 30 minutes. The Scotsman’s information supposedly comes from Jovanovic, a colleague of Fila’s, not from Chartier.
What are we supposed to believe?
Concern about Dokmanovic was raised either by a psychiatrist, a doctor, Dokmanovic complaining to his guards, or by his lawyer. Subsequently, either the prison guards, or his lawyer, decided to either put him on suicide watch or on informal monitoring. The reason for this was either because of depression or a health concern, and he was either given medication or not (but either way they left him his tie and razor even though in one of these universes he had already attempted to commit suicide twice!). The source for all of this is mostly one Christian Chartier, who is reported to have said in one account that Dokmanovic was placed on suicide watch, but in another (as we shall see), that he was not placed on suicide watch! If people are straightforwardly reporting the facts from mostly one source -- one man, Christian Chartier -- is it possible to get this many different stories in two days?
ğğ Continue to
Footnotes and Further
 BBC Worldwide Monitoring, June 30, 1998
 AP Worldstream, June 29, 1998; Monday, International news, 670 words, AP Photo AMS101, JENIFER CHAO, THE HAGUE, Netherlands
 Inter Press Service, September 22, 1998, Tuesday, 844 words, RIGHTS-YUGOSLAVIA: DEATHS IN THE HAGUE "JUSTIFY" BELGRADE STANCE, By Vesna Peric-Zimonjic, BELGRADE, Sep. 22
 Deutsche Presse-Agentur, June 29, 1998, Monday, International News, 497 words, Serb war-crimes suspect found hanged in cell days before verdict due, The Hague
 The Scotsman, June 30, 1998, Tuesday, Pg. 9, 601 words, SERB WAR CRIMES SUSPECT FOUND HANGED IN CELL, Alex Blair Foreign Affairs Reporter
MORE HIR ARTICLES ON:
Notify me of new HIR pieces!