FRANCISCO J GIL-WHITE
Click a column heading to sort by that field.
Ratings for Courses, Instructors, and Difficulty are on a scale from 0.00 to 4.00.
| Course Listings
|
| PSYC-172-001 |
Fall 2004 |
Biocultural Psychology - Biocultural Psychology |
15/23 |
3.57 |
3.36 |
2.71 |
| PSYC-372-301 |
Spring 2004 |
- |
9/9 |
2.78 |
3.22 |
2.78 |
| PSYC-472-001 |
Spring 2004 |
- |
32/39 |
2.69 |
2.88 |
2.16 |
| PSYC-172-001 |
Fall 2003 |
Biocultural Psychology - Biocultural Psychology |
22/29 |
2.82 |
2.91 |
2.68 |
| PSYC-172-001 |
Spring 2003 |
Biocultural Psychology |
26/38 |
2.36 |
2.72 |
2.44 |
| PSYC-372-301 |
Spring 2003 |
- |
12/13 |
2.67 |
3.17 |
2.25 |
Course Reviews
(No comments have been submitted yet.)
| Ratings for FRANCISCO J GIL-WHITE | |
| Overall Quality of the course. | 3.57 | | Overall Quality of the instructor. | 3.36 | | Please rate the difficulty of the course. (0=easy to 4=difficult) | 2.71 | | Instructor's ability to communicate the subject matter. | 3.29 | | Instructor's accessibility and willingness to to discuss course content and any problems. | 3.69 | | Value of assigned readings. | 3.33 | | Amount learned from this course in terms of knowledge, concepts, skills and thinking ability. | 3.57 | | Please rate the amount of work required for this course. (0=very little to 4=very much) | 2.29 | | Would you recommend this course to a major? (0=no to 4=strongly) | 3.64 | | Would you recommend this course to a non-major? (0=no to 4=strongly) | 3.14 | | Was the instructor able to stimulate your interest in the material? | 3.57 |
(No comments have been submitted yet.)
| Ratings for FRANCISCO J GIL-WHITE | |
| Overall Quality of the course. | 2.78 | | Overall Quality of the instructor. | 3.22 | | Please rate the difficulty of the course. (0=easy to 4=difficult) | 2.78 | | Instructor's ability to communicate the subject matter. | 2.89 | | Instructor's accessibility and willingness to to discuss course content and any problems. | 3.44 | | Value of assigned readings. | 2.33 | | Amount learned from this course in terms of knowledge, concepts, skills and thinking ability. | 3.33 | | Please rate the amount of work required for this course. (0=very little to 4=very much) | 2.78 | | Would you recommend this course to a major? (0=no to 4=strongly) | 2.78 | | Would you recommend this course to a non-major? (0=no to 4=strongly) | 1.44 | | Was the instructor able to stimulate your interest in the material? | 3.00 |
(No comments have been submitted yet.)
| Ratings for FRANCISCO J GIL-WHITE | |
| Overall Quality of the course. | 2.69 | | Overall Quality of the instructor. | 2.88 | | Please rate the difficulty of the course. (0=easy to 4=difficult) | 2.16 | | Instructor's ability to communicate the subject matter. | 3.13 | | Instructor's accessibility and willingness to to discuss course content and any problems. | 3.45 | | Value of assigned readings. | 2.28 | | Amount learned from this course in terms of knowledge, concepts, skills and thinking ability. | 2.88 | | Please rate the amount of work required for this course. (0=very little to 4=very much) | 2.41 | | Would you recommend this course to a major? (0=no to 4=strongly) | 2.94 | | Would you recommend this course to a non-major? (0=no to 4=strongly) | 2.47 | | Was the instructor able to stimulate your interest in the material? | 3.16 |
(No comments have been submitted yet.)
| Ratings for FRANCISCO J GIL-WHITE | |
| Overall Quality of the course. | 2.82 | | Overall Quality of the instructor. | 2.91 | | Please rate the difficulty of the course. (0=easy to 4=difficult) | 2.68 | | Instructor's ability to communicate the subject matter. | 2.95 | | Instructor's accessibility and willingness to to discuss course content and any problems. | 3.27 | | Value of assigned readings. | 2.77 | | Amount learned from this course in terms of knowledge, concepts, skills and thinking ability. | 2.91 | | Please rate the amount of work required for this course. (0=very little to 4=very much) | 2.41 | | Would you recommend this course to a major? (0=no to 4=strongly) | 2.81 | | Would you recommend this course to a non-major? (0=no to 4=strongly) | 2.23 | | Was the instructor able to stimulate your interest in the material? | 2.77 |
(No comments have been submitted yet.)
| Ratings for FRANCISCO J GIL-WHITE | |
| Overall Quality of the course. | 2.36 | | Overall Quality of the instructor. | 2.72 | | Please rate the difficulty of the course. (0=easy to 4=difficult) | 2.44 | | Instructor's ability to communicate the subject matter. | 3.08 | | Instructor's accessibility and willingness to to discuss course content and any problems. | 3.17 | | Value of assigned readings. | 2.60 | | Amount learned from this course in terms of knowledge, concepts, skills and thinking ability. | 2.72 | | Please rate the amount of work required for this course. (0=very little to 4=very much) | 2.08 | | Would you recommend this course to a major? (0=no to 4=strongly) | 2.36 | | Would you recommend this course to a non-major? (0=no to 4=strongly) | 1.92 | | Was the instructor able to stimulate your interest in the material? | 2.56 |
(No comments have been submitted yet.)
| Ratings for FRANCISCO J GIL-WHITE | |
| Overall Quality of the course. | 2.67 | | Overall Quality of the instructor. | 3.17 | | Please rate the difficulty of the course. (0=easy to 4=difficult) | 2.25 | | Instructor's ability to communicate the subject matter. | 3.25 | | Instructor's accessibility and willingness to to discuss course content and any problems. | 3.83 | | Value of assigned readings. | 2.00 | | Amount learned from this course in terms of knowledge, concepts, skills and thinking ability. | 2.92 | | Please rate the amount of work required for this course. (0=very little to 4=very much) | 2.42 | | Would you recommend this course to a major? (0=no to 4=strongly) | 3.25 | | Would you recommend this course to a non-major? (0=no to 4=strongly) | 2.08 | | Was the instructor able to stimulate your interest in the material? | 2.92 |
|
